home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: nntp.teleport.com!sschaem
- From: sschaem@teleport.com (Stephan Schaem)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer
- Subject: Re: CHIP RAM speed test results
- Date: 24 Mar 1996 02:27:04 GMT
- Organization: Teleport - Portland's Public Access (503) 220-1016
- Message-ID: <4j2bto$i03@nadine.teleport.com>
- References: <38232981@kone.fipnet.fi> <4ico8k$2vau@columba.udac.uu.se> <42116651@phoenix.owl.de> <4iogfh$e6i@serpens.rhein.de> <4iss4q$2762@columba.udac.uu.se>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: kelly.teleport.com
- X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
-
- Kristofer Maad (m93kma@sabik.tdb.uu.se) wrote:
- : Michael van Elst (mlelstv@serpens.rhein.de) wrote:
- : : "Frank Wille" <frank@phoenix.owl.de> writes:
- : : >So MOVE16 is 50% faster, although the A3640 doesn't support burst
- : : >transfers.
-
- : : Sure. The MOVE16 instruction bypasses the cache.
-
- : Why not simply turn off the data cache during copy, then? Could save
- : some cycles.
-
- : Just a thought...
-
- You might have a task switch during the copy. I dont think the amiga support
- cpu setting per task :( But on a 030 it might be worth it for some rare case
-
- Stephan
-